Must Read

  • 83-Year-Old Joe Ligon Released After 68 Years in Prison: A Look at His Life Sentence and the Legal Implications

    Joe Ligon was 83 when he was released from prison in 2021 after serving nearly seven decades for crimes he committed as a 15-year-old in 1953. When he was freed, he made headlines for his record-breaking sentence and his profound transformation. Ligon’s release, which occurred after Pennsylvania authorities granted him freedom, has prompted a larger…

  • Man from 2015 Viral Courtroom Reunion with Judge Arrested Again for Similar Crimes

    A man whose viral 2015 courtroom reunion with Judge Mindy Glazer is still remembered by many is back behind bars after allegedly committing a string of similar crimes. Recent robbery victims can breathe a sigh of relief after Miami Police arrested Arthur Nathaniel Booth, 58, in connection with multiple crimes, including the robbery of 85-year-old…

  • 5 Changes to U.S. Immigration Under Trump And Why Immigrant Communities Are Facing Fear and Uncertainty

    Since Donald Trump assumed the presidency for his second term, his administration has rapidly rolled out sweeping immigration policies that have significantly altered the landscape of U.S. immigration. These changes, many of which were enacted within the first few days of his return to office, reflect the administration’s continued focus on strict immigration enforcement and…

  • The Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Gonzalez v. Google: Implications for Internet Liability

    In February 2023, the United States Supreme Court heard Gonzalez v. Google, a pivotal case examining the extent of legal protections for internet platforms under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA). This case centered on whether platforms like Google could be held liable for algorithmically recommending user-generated content that promotes terrorism. Background The…

  • Understanding the Key Differences Between ROFOs and ROFRs in Real Estate Transactions

    When navigating real estate transactions, it’s crucial to understand the distinctions between two common tools used by buyers and sellers: Rights of First Offer (ROFOs) and Rights of First Refusal (ROFRs). Both provide potential purchasers with the right to acquire an asset before it’s sold to others, but they function in fundamentally different ways, and…

  • Marbury v. Madison (1803): The Case That Established Judicial Review and Shaped U.S. Legal Precedent

    In 1803, a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case, Marbury v. Madison, established a crucial principle of American constitutional law: the power of judicial review. This case continues to shape the workings of the U.S. legal system today. To understand its importance, we must first look at the events that led up to the case, the…

  • Buck v. Bell (1927): A Dark Chapter in U.S. Legal History

    In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision in Buck v. Bell that has since remained one of the most controversial in American legal history. The case centered around Carrie Buck, a young woman from Virginia who was forcibly sterilized after being diagnosed with “feeblemindedness.” The Case of Carrie Buck Carrie Buck’s story…

  • Abrams v. United States: How a Group of Leaflets Sparked a Major Free Speech Showdown

    The Case and Background In 1919, Abrams v. United States emerged as a seminal case on free speech, exploring the extent of government authority to limit dissent during wartime. Amidst World War I, five Russian immigrants in New York, including Jacob Abrams, were arrested under the 1917 Espionage Act. The group, anti-war activists who opposed…

  • Donald Trump Retakes White House Stunning Comeback

    Donald Trump made an extraordinary political comeback, reclaiming the presidency just four years after voters chose to end his first term. His victory ushers in a new era of American leadership, one that promises to reshape the nation’s future both domestically and internationally. At 78, Trump secured more than 270 Electoral College votes, surpassing the…

  • U.S. Courtroom Traditions: Robes, Gavels, and the Formalities That Uphold Judicial Authority

    In the U.S., there are certain customs, practices, and traditions that reflect the solemnity and formality of the judicial process. These traditions vary by jurisdiction, court level, and individual judges, but some notable customs include: 1. Robes and Judicial Attire 2. Opening Court Sessions 3. Gavel 4. Portrait Ceremonies 5. Judicial Oaths 6. Retirement Traditions…