Judge Rules in Favor of School That Barred OnlyFans Mom from Volunteering

Victoria Triece

A Florida mother has lost her legal battle against Orange County Public Schools (OCPS) after she sued for being banned from volunteering at her children’s elementary school due to her OnlyFans account.

Victoria Triece, 33, filed a $1 million lawsuit in 2023, alleging that the district violated her rights when it prohibited her from participating in school activities at Sand Lake Elementary School in Orlando.

However, a Florida judge ruled against her on January 29, determining that Triece had no legal entitlement to volunteer.

Lawsuit Against Orange County Public Schools

Triece’s legal dispute began in 2021 when an anonymous parent emailed the school principal, attaching two explicit photos from her subscription-based adult content page.

The email, reported by WFTV, expressed concern that her online presence was inappropriate given her proximity to students.

The principal escalated the matter to school district officials, ultimately leading to Triece’s removal from volunteer duties. In response, Triece sued OCPS, alleging violations of her rights to privacy and free speech. She also accused the district of sexual cyber harassment, arguing that officials improperly circulated her images.

During a 2023 press conference, her attorney, Mark NeJame, decried the decision, stating, “What she does in her off time is not illegal,” and accusing the district of acting as “morality police.”

Despite her arguments, the court found that Triece did not have a protected right to volunteer at the school and dismissed her claims.

Legal Implications and Privacy Concerns

Triece’s case highlights ongoing legal debates surrounding privacy rights, online expression, and professional consequences.

While her content was behind a paywall, its distribution to school officials and subsequent ban raised questions about the limits of personal freedom in professional and community settings.

Although she has not publicly announced plans to appeal, the case has sparked discussions about the reach of digital footprints and their impact on real-world opportunities.