Prosecutors Seek 14-Year Prison Term in Tom Girardi Fraud Case

Prosecutors Seek 14-Year Prison Sentence for Tom Girardi

Federal prosecutors requested a 14-year prison sentence for Tom Girardi, the disbarred California attorney convicted of stealing millions in client funds. In August, a jury found Girardi guilty of four counts of wire fraud after prosecutors revealed he embezzled $15 million from settlement funds.

Prosecutors Demand Harsh Punishment Despite Girardi’s Age

Acknowledging Girardi’s advanced age of 85 and his “some cognitive impairment,” prosecutors argued for a significant federal prison sentence. They stated in a sentencing memo filed Friday in Los Angeles federal court that Girardi’s actions represented a profound betrayal of trust.

“His calculated theft of client funds and his lies to cover it up devastated the people who sought his help during their darkest times,” prosecutors emphasized.

Defense Pushes for Medical Care Over Prison

Girardi’s federal public defenders countered the prosecution’s request, urging the court to sentence him to life in a medical facility instead. They argued that Girardi, given his age and medical condition, would likely die in prison. They also contended that his circumstances made him an ideal candidate for medical release.

“Federal facilities are not equipped to handle his needs, and he poses no risk to the public or chance of re-offending,” the defense said.

Sentencing and Broader Implications

The court scheduled Girardi’s sentencing for December 20. The outcome may influence federal prosecutors in Chicago, who are pursuing separate charges against Girardi for allegedly misappropriating over $3 million from victims of the 2018 Boeing 737 MAX Lion Air crash.

Once a prominent figure in the plaintiffs’ bar, Girardi’s career inspired the Oscar-winning film Erin Brockovich. However, his downfall has been staggering. Since allegations emerged in 2020, Girardi has suffered catastrophic personal, financial, and professional ruin.

Girardi’s defense team continues to argue that he suffers from dementia, although a federal judge deemed him competent to stand trial. Whether the court will prioritize punishment or medical care remains to be seen.