Man Files Discrimination Lawsuit Against Hotel After Resume Name Change Got Him The Job

Dwight Jackson

Dwight Jackson, a 27-year-old Black man from Detroit, has initiated legal action against the Shinola Hotel, alleging racial discrimination.

Jackson claims that despite applying for various positions at the hotel from January to April using his real name and extensive luxury hotel experience, he received no responses.

According to CNN, Jackson asserts that he only received an interview after altering his resume, substituting his name with “John Jebrowski,” which he describes as a more Caucasian-sounding name.

Jackson’s attorney, Jon Marko, stated that during the interview at Shinola Hotel, Jackson confronted the interviewer by disclosing his true identity.

He expressed his belief that his original name, perceived as traditionally African American, had been a barrier to employment opportunities.

The lawsuit, filed on July 3 under the Michigan Elliott Larsen Civil Rights Act, accuses Shinola Hotel of discriminatory hiring practices based on racial considerations related to applicants’ names.

Shortly after his interview using the altered name, Jackson was informed that he would not proceed further in the hiring process, according to the lawsuit.

Marko told CNN that Jackson’s objective is to raise awareness about systemic issues beyond Shinola Hotel, ensuring such discriminatory practices do not affect others.

Responding to the allegations, Sage Hospitality Group, the operating partner of Shinola Hotel, issued a statement to PEOPLE, affirming their commitment to a workplace free from discrimination.

“We take this allegation very seriously and do not tolerate discrimination of any kind,” the spokesperson stated. “We are dedicated to fostering an inclusive workplace where everyone has the opportunity to succeed and support our diverse workforce.”

The company further noted that their internal investigation revealed significant inconsistencies in Jackson’s claims.

Sage Hospitality Group expressed disappointment that the plaintiff’s counsel chose to publicize unsubstantiated claims before completing a thorough investigation.