A Network of Attorneys Describes Trump Administration ‘Most Anti-Black’ in 150 Years

A prominent civil rights attorney and author has sharply criticised the Trump administration, describing it as the most hostile to Black Americans since the late 19th century and warning of serious legal consequences for civil rights enforcement in the United States.

In a video shared by The Defiant Lawyers Network on Instagram, attorney Augustus Corbett argued that policies pursued under President Donald Trump amount to a systematic dismantling of long-standing civil rights protections, particularly in education.

“The Trump administration is shaping up to be the most anti-Black administration in the last 150 years,” Corbett said, drawing a historical comparison to President Rutherford B. Hayes, whose withdrawal of federal troops from the American South in 1877 effectively ended the first Reconstruction era following the U.S. Civil War.

Corbett contended that while Hayes ended what historians describe as the first Reconstruction, the Trump administration is undoing what he called a “second Reconstruction” that began with the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

He warned that the erosion of federal oversight threatens legal safeguards built through decades of litigation, legislation, and court enforcement.

The attorney also linked current political outcomes to voter behaviour, arguing that divisions within the Black electorate during recent elections contributed to the present situation. He claimed that calls by some activists to disengage from voting or to support Trump had lasting consequences, particularly for children.

As an example, Corbett referenced reporting by ProPublica, which found that tens of thousands of civil rights complaints filed by Black students alleging racial harassment in schools were not acted upon by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. According to the report he cited, the office had shifted its focus toward complaints involving white students and efforts to end diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

From a legal perspective, such claims raise concerns about selective enforcement of civil rights laws, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial discrimination in federally funded education programmes.

Corbett said the situation underscores the real-world impact of federal policy shifts, arguing that children are bearing the brunt of weakened civil rights enforcement. He added that his warnings about the Trump-linked policy blueprint known as Project 2025 were intended to alert voters to the potential rollback of civil rights protections if Trump returned to office.

“Elections have consequences,” Corbett said, urging continued civic engagement and vigilance in the defence of civil rights.

The Trump campaign and the U.S. Department of Education have not responded publicly to the specific claims raised in the video.

However, debates over DEI policies, federal civil rights enforcement, and the scope of executive authority remain central legal and political issues in the United States.