Several Families Allege In Lawsuits That Organs of Deceased Alabama Inmates Removed Without Consent

Alabama Inmates

Several families in Alabama have filed lawsuits alleging that the organs of their deceased loved ones were removed without consent while in state custody.

The lawsuits contain disturbing allegations against the Alabama Department of Corrections and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), raising questions about ethical practices and legal oversight in the handling of inmate remains.

The cases involve instances where family members were informed by funeral homes that the bodies of their deceased relatives returned without major organs.

In one instance, the organs were discovered missing only after hiring a private pathologist to perform an autopsy.

The families assert that they were not approached for consent regarding the retention of the organs, nor were the deceased individuals registered as organ donors.

Legal action has been initiated against the Alabama Department of Corrections and UAB, accusing them of unauthorized retention of organs, fraud, negligence, and other counts.

The lawsuits allege that the organs were used for teaching purposes without proper authorization. A significant portion of the UAB Division of Autopsy’s income is reported to have been derived from autopsies conducted for the corrections department.

The situation has prompted scrutiny from legal experts and ethicists, who express concerns about the lack of oversight and transparency in the handling of inmate remains.

Despite assurances from both institutions regarding compliance with laws governing autopsies, questions remain about the circumstances under which consent was obtained and the disposition of the organs after examination.

Furthermore, revelations from UAB medical students in 2018 raise additional ethical concerns. Medical students questioned the consent process for the use of inmate organs in teaching and research, expressing discomfort with the practice.

Their concerns were dismissed by the university’s ethics committee, which asserted that there was no lack of ethicality in the retention and use of inmate organs.

The families affected by these allegations demand answers and accountability from the authorities involved.

They express shock and outrage over the violation of their loved ones’ dignity and autonomy, calling the situation “grave robbery and mutilation.”

The lawsuits seek justice for the deceased inmates and their families, as well as reforms to prevent similar incidents in the future.